Former Shell, Anglo bosses back conflict | World Mining
- Analyst
- Mar 11
- 5 min read
Former Shell, Anglo bosses back conflict – World Mining News
This article is an on-site model of our Energy Source publication. Premium subscribers can signal up right here to get the publication delivered each Tuesday and Thursday. Standard subscribers can improve to Premium right here, or discover all FT newsletters
Hello and welcome back to Energy Source, coming to you from New York, the place buyers are watching how BP responds to information that activist hedge fund Elliott Management is focusing on the oil main.
BP, which reported a steep fall in earnings this morning, may very well be compelled to change its management, record within the US and even break itself up, in line with some of the company’s largest shareholders. Chief government Murray Auchincloss has stated he’s prepared for a “fundamental reset”.
“Radical options will now be on the table, and perhaps even likely,” stated David Cumming, head of UK equities at Newton Investment Management, in an interview with the Financial Times.
Elliott has a sturdy document of forcing change on poorly performing firms, together with most just lately efficiently advocating for the break- up of Honeywell, the US industrial conglomerate.
Elliott has not revealed the scale of its stake in BP however the hedge fund’s curiosity within the company will heap strain on Auchincloss as he tries to show across the oil main’s fortunes.
In as we speak’s publication, our commodities correspondent Camilla Hodgson stories on a new initiative within the critical minerals sector, which is geared toward serving to mediate disputes in an more and more divided and harmful world.
Thanks for studying, Jamie
Mediators step into the fractious world of critical minerals
A new conflict decision group centered on the vitality and mining sectors is in talks to land its inaugural project because it appears to make a identify for itself because the critical minerals space turns into more and more geopolitically fraught.
Resource Resolutions, backed by former Shell chair Chad Holliday and former Anglo American chief government Mark Cutifani, goals to help facilitate dialogue between opponents to help resolve resource-related conflicts.
Disputes within the sectors have been “growing” and “likely to get more intense in the years and decades ahead”, stated co-founder Daniel Litvin. “We’ve had a growing set of very positive conversations with potential funding organisations regarding live situations.”
Governments worldwide have gotten more and more aware of the need to secure entry to the critical metals and minerals needed for every thing from the vitality transition to shopper electronics and Big Tech knowledge centres.
But mining and vitality tasks can come into conflict with the desires and priorities of communities and indigenous teams, or pose environmental dangers that draw native opposition.
First Quantum Minerals’ big copper mine in Panama was abruptly shuttered in 2023 amid anti-mining protests, whereas Rio Tinto has sought to counter broad public opposition in Serbia to its proposal for what could be Europe’s greatest lithium mine.
“Resource nationalism ebbs and flows,” stated Cutifani, and was at current being fuelled by a period of “geopolitical change and complexity”.
Resource Resolutions desires to help mediate such disputes and may very well be employed by firms, governments or native communities, although it’s not aiming to offer legal companies. The group says it is not going to take the facet of the celebration paying for its companies.
“It’s not taking sides . . . Any group that hires us is not hiring us to win their case,” stated Litvin.
Instead, Resource Resolutions will work on a phased foundation, doing an initial evaluation of a project earlier than deciding whether or not potential “win wins” and constructive outcomes may very well be achieved for all related stakeholder teams, not simply the miner, and if that’s the case, serving to broker talks in regards to the scheme.
Some tasks “shouldn’t progress” since they is likely to be, for instance, environmentally damaging, stated Litvin. “The value we can bring long term is our independence. So it’s very important to be able to walk away.”
Hugely costly vitality and mining schemes have been “fertile ground” for conflicts that may “arise over the life of a project as political power shifts and social and environmental concerns take root”, stated Christopher Garvey, founder of litigation finance adviser Sachenga & Co.
“This offers enormous opportunity for those who are able to mediate in those disputes, which requires a complex blend of political, social and financial expertise,” stated Garvey. However, it was “dangerous terrain . . . Getting paid hourly, that’s one thing, but being paid on results is very different.”
Resource Resolutions has not disclosed how its charges will likely be structured or calculated. Holliday and Cutifani haven’t disclosed the sizes of their investments within the group.
Companies and buyers may also flip to worldwide arbitration to hunt damages in disputes over company property.
Barrick Gold and Orano are among the many miners which have just lately launched arbitration claims towards the west African governments of Mali and Niger, respectively, as navy juntas within the Sahel area have imposed dramatic modifications to mining codes and demanded increased tax funds.
When relations soured in natural sources tasks, arbitration was usually the “preferred dispute mechanism”, stated Hugo Corden-Lloyd, a senior affiliate at consultancy The Risk Advisory Group. “The private nature of arbitration, which is one of the reasons it is a favoured concept, makes it difficult to know the full scale of ongoing investor-state disputes.”
Arbitration will be vastly costly, take years and the small print of instances, and even their existence, are sometimes confidential.
Companies within the sector have been working in an “increasingly fractious operating environment”, stated Corden-Lloyd, including that some governments have been now treating miners as a means to “quickly raise cash and legitimise their own position”. (Camilla Hodgson)
Power Points
Can the nuclear industry find a higher solution to construct through the use of copies of established reactors to keep prices down?
The UK introduced new subsidies for Drax’s biomass energy station, regardless of ongoing controversy over whether or not the wooden pellets it burns are environmentally sustainable.
TotalEnergies urges Europe to hunt a grand discount with Trump: buy more LNG in return for longer-term licenses for firms
Energy Source is written and edited by Jamie Smyth, Myles McCormick, Amanda Chu, Tom Wilson and Malcolm Moore, with assist from the FT’s international staff of reporters. Reach us at vitality.source@ft.com and comply with us on X at @FTEnergy. Catch up on previous editions of the publication right here.
Recommended newsletters for you
Moral Money — Our unmissable publication on socially accountable business, sustainable finance and more. Sign up right here
The Climate Graphic: Explained — Understanding probably the most important climate knowledge of the week. Sign up right here
…
Stay forward of the curve with the most recent information in Mining and Minerals. Our web site is your final vacation spot for the best critical mining information.
Kommentare